When Leaders Retreat: Anthony Albanese’s Factional Roots and the Crisis of Civic Courage

Written by urbanwronski

“America’s ruling class is failing us”, laments Robert Reich in today’s The Guardian Australia. Reich’s right to indict his nation’s leaders for sitting on their hands; retreating into social media, as Trump and his goons strip Americans of their constitutional rights. But before we give ourselves a koala stamp for having dodged an LNP in MAGA hats, let’s have a quick, hard look at our current leaders. Where are they? An equally troubling paralysis of will bedevils Australian politics.

Reich could not help but reassure Australian voters that what they’re witnessing isn’t unique to Australia – it’s part of a broader global phenomenon where traditional leadership classes have abandoned their moral obligations to democracy and the common good.

He’d likely argue that Australian leaders, like their American counterparts, have “succumbed to greed, small-mindedness, insularity, and cowardice” Robert Reich | Substack rather than standing up for democratic principles when it matters most. Whether it’s university chancellors staying silent on important issues, business leaders prioritizing profit over principle, or political leaders avoiding difficult moral stands, the pattern is eerily familiar.

Put aside, for a moment, the populist Nationals and Trump-adjacent Liberals—our own wing-nut MAGA cosplay troupe, who would import the Trump dystopia, replete with bottles of fake tan wholesale if they could. If only their stupidity, charmless grift and total disunity didn’t keep them in permanent self-exile. LNP clownshow aside, the real danger is subtler: a tango with cowardice performed by our elected leaders. Not the spectacle of empty words, but the cult of strategic invisibility. Not overt cruelty, but the genteel acceptance that serious leadership clashes with donor schedules, boardroom after-parties and career exit strategies.

The Albanese Disappearing Act

Anthony Albanese’s style—polite, consensus-seeking, moderate—would be charming in an uncle wearing carpet slippers and elbow patches. Of course it’s an act. Our own Sandy Stone is also a veteran factional warlord.  Indeed Albanese’s deep factional roots, which helped him survive and eventually win Labor leadership, may indeed be precisely what prevents him from exercising the kind of bold moral leadership Reich argues democracy desperately needs.But Albo has trained himself to evade decisive moral leadership. Nor is he any Don Quixote of the poor. But he does don the beige cardigan of caution. Avoid risk.

Factional politics in the ALP operates on a complex web of obligations, compromises, and calculated positioning. Leaders who’ve mastered this system, like Albanese, often become experts at triangulation rather than moral clarity. They learn to balance competing factional interests, manage internal party dynamics, and avoid taking positions that might fracture their carefully constructed coalitions.

Is Albo a class-traitor? In the face of a housing inferno, a climate emergency and rising inequality, studied inoffensiveness is complicity. Cue our ongoing media circus over whether the PM will meet Donald John Trump, the High Priest of lies, deceit and betrayal? Trump-who-never-pays-his-dues. The senile delinquent. The debate isn’t about policy or moral reckoning, but whether our leader could curry favour by paying homage. This isn’t diplomacy; it is showbiz, a symptom of a political class and its Murdoch claque that believes power must be flattered regardless of its character. It is leadership as mimicry, not mandate. Will it prevail? You can bet your house on it—if you still have one.

What would we rather our leaders do? Here’s a short list for starters.

The Housing Emergency

Australia isn’t merely “slipping”; we’re in a full-blown housing emergency. The National Housing Supply and Affordability Council projects we’ll miss the national target of 1.2 million homes by 375,000. Mortgage repayments devour 50% of median family income. For those on pensions or JobSeeker, Anglicare finds affordable rentals at essentially zero. Even after rent assistance, 42% of low-income renters are still in stress.

This isn’t a policy problem; it’s a moral abdication. Homes are treated as financial instruments for the investment class, not a fundamental right.

Corporate Capture and Climate Hypocrisy

As housing becomes unaffordable, fossil-fuel subsidies balloon. In 2023-24, governments lavished $14.5 billion on coal, oil and gas; a whopping 31% increase. In 2024-25: $14.9 billion, with $67 billion projected over the forward estimates.

That’s six to seven times the funding for the Housing Australia Future Fund. Every dollar funnelled into dirty energy is a dollar stolen from homes, clean power and public transport. Yet leaders reframe this grand larceny as a “balanced trade-off.” It’s not balance; it’s capture.

Trust and the Media’s Permission Slip

Leadership vacuums corrode trust. OECD data shows trust in the federal government hovering around 46%. But surveys find only 26–27% of Australians trust federal parliament. The mismatch is damning: people don’t yet distrust institutions outright, but they’ve lost faith in the people running them. And when leaders are unmasked as inert, institutions rust.

The media plays accomplice. More mirror than magnifier, it reflects the glitz of celebrity politics and factional gossip while ignoring substance. Not “How does coal expansion sabotage climate goals?” but “Who won at this week’s press club?” Journalism as celebrity gossip doesn’t just fail to hold leaders to account—it grants them permission to do nothing.

What Leadership Could Look Like

Reich reminds us leadership doesn’t require a title. Gandhi, King, Mandela led through moral authority. What would that look like here?

  • Policy courage: Admit the obvious—fossil-fuel subsidies are incompatible with net-zero. Phase them out, fund housing and renewables.
  • Legislative guts: Reform negative gearing and capital gains discounts that turbocharge speculation. Mandate inclusionary zoning to lift social housing to 10% of stock.
  • Clear accountability: Build trust by acting trustworthily: clear policy roadmaps, rejection of donor capture, genuine consultation.
  • A robust Fourth Estate: Journalism that magnifies substance, not spectacle. Protects whistleblowers. Investigates fearlessly. Supports local civic reporting. Not a Canberra club fed on press drops but an independent crew who speak truth to power; hold the powerful to account.
  • Citizen muscle: Voting is the floor, not the ceiling. Advocacy, protest, and presence are essential. When citizens refuse performance art and demand purpose, leaders will notice.

A Reckoning Ours to Choose

This isn’t abstract. It’s in your mortgage bill, your rent hike, the fossil-fuel subsidises your taxes bankroll. Reich is right: no saviour is coming. But this is no time for despair.

Australia’s leadership void is a test of civic character. Do we remember leadership is service, not status? Democracy is commitment, not convenience? Governing for the next generation requires risk, not policy minimalism?

For now, convenience is winning. But it’s reversible. If our leaders remain invisible, then we must make ourselves more prominent, more often: loud, persistent, and uncomfortably principled.

Reich would probably emphasize that Australia’s leadership vacuum creates both a crisis and an opportunity. The crisis is obvious – when institutions meant to protect democratic values fail to do so, democracy itself becomes vulnerable. But the opportunity lies in recognizing that “True leadership doesn’t necessarily require high office. It doesn’t require a fancy title.” Robert Reich | Substack

Most importantly, Reich would likely tell Australian voters that waiting for better leaders to emerge from existing institutions is a losing strategy. Instead, he’d argue that “the rest of us have to be leaders. You must be a leader. We are the leaders we’ve been waiting for.” Robert Reich | Substack

In practical terms, this would mean Australian citizens need to organize, speak out, hold their representatives accountable, and create the moral pressure that their formal leaders are failing to provide. The solution isn’t just voting for better politicians – it’s becoming the civic force that compels all leaders to remember their democratic obligations.

3 thoughts on “When Leaders Retreat: Anthony Albanese’s Factional Roots and the Crisis of Civic Courage”

  1. A true Don Quixote of the poor would be someone who, despite the political costs, consistently champions bold redistributive policies, challenges corporate power head-on, and refuses to moderate their positions for electoral palatability. They’d be willing to seem “unrealistic” or “idealistic” in pursuit of transformative change for working-class Australians.

    Albanese, by contrast, represents what we might call “managed social democracy” – incremental changes within acceptable bounds. His approach to poverty and inequality has been cautious and means-tested rather than transformational. Think of how Labor handled issues like:

    • The Stage 3 tax cuts (eventually modified but not scrapped entirely)
    • Housing policy (some measures but no fundamental challenge to negative gearing or capital gains concessions)
    • Jobseeker rates (small increases rather than substantial reform)
    • Corporate tax avoidance (some action but hardly revolutionary)

    A Don Quixote figure would have said “the hell with political pragmatism” and fought for a universal basic income, massive public housing programs, or wealth taxes – even if it meant losing elections.

    But Albanese’s factional training taught him that politics is the art of the possible, not the art of the ideal. He’s learned to read the political winds, manage competing interests, and deliver what’s achievable rather than what’s necessary.

    Reich would probably argue that in times of crisis, we need leaders willing to seem “quixotic” – to fight the impossible fight because incremental change isn’t adequate to the moment.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. If Albanese had any integrity at all , his Govt would have had sanctions on Israel two years ago, but the Zionists have him running scared.

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.