
In the new catechism of American reaction, liberty means obedience. The ritual is simple: hand on heart, salute, murmur your reverence. Fail in this act and you are marked a heretic, an enemy of the people, guilty of thought-crime against the cult.
Attila the Trump is busy laying gold leaf in his outhouse while the barbarians are already inside the gate. The décor is Vegas kitsch, but the mood is late-imperial Rome: a carnival of distraction while the foundations crack. Nero fiddled, Caligula made his horse, Incitatus, a senator, Trump applies gilt to the latrine—each tyrant finding his own grotesque hobby as their world collapses around them.
But this is no ordinary sack of the city. The besiegers were invited in. They sit on congressional committees, fill statehouses, and beam nightly from Fox studios. And what has stirred their blood recently? Not famine, not plague, not foreign invasion, but the curious passion play of perpetual victimhood. Charlie Kirk, a fixture in the grievance economy, has been elevated to near-martyrdom status in the culture wars—not through any arrows of persecution, but through the theatrical amplification of minor slights into existential threats.
The Machinery of Manufactured Martyrdom
In the new catechism of American reaction, liberty means obedience. The ritual is simple: hand on heart, salute, murmur your reverence. Fail in this act and you are marked a heretic, an enemy of the people, guilty of thought-crime against the cult. In Orwellian inversion, freedom of speech becomes the duty to parrot; freedom of conscience becomes the obligation to genuflect. Joseph McCarthy would indeed recognize this playbook instantly; salute its refinement.
Kirk’s memorial/rally/revival perfectly encapsulates this phenomenon. Trump entered the stage to fireworks, accompanied by Lee Greenwood’s live rendition of “God Bless the USA,” transforming what should have been a solemn occasion into a campaign rally. This wasn’t mourning—it was political theater, complete with pyrotechnics and patriotic soundtrack.
The Gospel According to Grievance
Trump’s recent statements reveal the true nature of this movement. His declaration that he hates Democrats; “I cannot stand them”, isn’t an aberration but the logical endpoint of a politics that treats opposition as treason. When he praised Kirk by falsely declaring, “He did not hate his opponents… That’s where I differ,” Trump accidentally revealed the authoritarian heart of his project: the explicit rejection of democratic pluralism. Such repudiation reprises McCarthy’s dream: a political movement where loyalty is measured not by adherence to constitutional principles, but by the intensity of hatred for designated enemies. The senator from Wisconsin could only dream of the vast machinery that now exists to transform political opponents into existential threats requiring elimination rather than engagement.
The Fireworks of Fascism
There’s something deeply unsettling about fireworks at a memorial service; a confusion of celebration with mourning that speaks to the movement’s deeper confusion of performance with governance. This is politics as entertainment, democracy as reality show, where the line between genuine emotion and manufactured spectacle is erased entirely.
Yet the pageantry serves a purpose beyond mere theatrics. When political events become religious ceremonies complete with martyrs, saints, and ritualised hatred of heretics, democratic deliberation becomes impossible. Citizens are no longer fellow Americans with different priorities; they are believers and infidels in a holy war.
The Infrastructure of Intolerance
What makes Trump’s moment particularly dangerous is the sophisticated infrastructure now supporting this politics of hatred. Unlike the McCarthy era, when opposition could organize through independent institutions, today’s authoritarians have built an ecosystem that spans traditional media, social platforms, and government itself.
The transformation of Charlie Kirk from political activist to secular saint illustrates this machinery at work. Through careful orchestration of outrage, amplification of grievance, and ritualised displays of loyalty, ordinary political figures become untouchable icons whose criticism constitutes blasphemy.
The Golden Toilet Throne
Meanwhile, Attila the Trump reclines, resplendent in his golden outhouse, attended by priests of grievance. He is a Liberace Nero, an emperor of tat, gilding the privy while the republic is sold off in pieces. His open declarations of hatred for half the electorate represent not a momentary lapse but a fundamental abdication of democratic leadership in favor of tribal authoritarianism.
If Plato warned us that democracy decays into tyranny when demagogues flatter the mob, and Juvenal asked “who watches the watchmen?” “Nobody”, seems to be the answer in today’s America. Americans are too busy participating in the liturgy of grievance, complete with fireworks and freedom songs, to give a fig for their constitutional and human rights.
The McCarthyist Revival
Joseph McCarthy would not only recognize this moment, he’d marvel at its sophistication. Where the Wisconsin senator had to rely on congressional hearings and newspaper coverage, today’s mega-demagogues and their Murdochs command an entire media ecosystem designed to amplify their message and silence dissent.
The parallels are striking: the same creation of enemy lists, the same demand for loyalty oaths (now called “salutes”), the same transformation of political opposition into treasonous conspiracy. But today’s version is more insidious because it operates through the forms of democracy while gouging out its substance, as media companies gouge the creative talent to which they, originally, owe their very existence.
The Republic Half-Gone
Is this the last straw for freedom of speech and thought in America? Not yet; but the danger lies in the machinery of outrage that can transform minor political figures into sacred martyrs, golden toilets into thrones, and liberty itself into a compulsory act of reverence.
When the pageantry of grievance becomes the national liturgy, when fireworks accompany memorial services, when presidents declare their hatred for half the citizenry, the republic is already half-gone. Up shit-creek in a barbed wire canoe. What remains is the form without the substance, the ritual without the meaning, the performance without the purpose.
The question is not whether American democracy will survive this assault, but whether Americans still remember what they’re supposed to be defending. When the barbarians are already inside the gate, and the emperor is too busy gilding his throne to notice, the only hope lies in citizens who still believe that democracy is worth more than a fireworks display.
.
From the Desk of Attila, King of the Huns
Enough is enough. I, Attila, scourge of Rome and terror of the Danube, draw the line at being likened to a certain orange-tinted real-estate salesman from Queens.
Let the record show: I was a cultured, cosmopolitan statesman who dined with emperors, negotiated treaties, and spoke Latin fluently (without needing cue cards). I presided over a vast confederation of peoples with a surprising degree of tolerance and sophistication, not some gaudy casino empire with tacky drapes.
And yet—libel!—my good name is dragged through the muck, yoked to a vulgarian who redecorates august chambers as if they were Tijuana bordellos.
Be advised: I am instructing my barbarian lawyers (a terrifying firm called Hun, Hun & Hun LLP) to commence proceedings for defamation, slander, and grievous insult to my memory. Damages sought: one herd of white stallions, ten carts of silk, and a lifetime supply of Roman amphorae.
You may tremble, for unlike him, when I said “I’ll build a wall,” it was usually to knock it down.
Signed,
Attila the Hun (civilised, cultured, and frankly insulted)
LikeLiked by 1 person
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Attila the Hun today categorically rejected comparisons to Donald J. Trump.
“Unlike Mr. Trump, I was a cultured ruler,” Attila said. “I dined with emperors, upheld treaties, and even tolerated Roman ambassadors who wore sandals indoors. To equate me with a man who drapes his chamber in golden polyester is defamatory.”
The King of the Huns has retained counsel at Hun, Hun & Hun LLP and is seeking reparations in horses, silks, and a formal apology.
LikeLike
Another excellent article, Urban. The galling feature of these proto-fascists is that their rat-cunning and ruthlessness are matched by ignorance, vulgarity and venality. They will continue to crush intellectualism, expertise and ‘incorrect’ knowledge. The barbarians are inside the gates and running amok. Trump having declared hatred for his political opponents, how long till they are declared illegitimate and the one-party state becomes reality?
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is galling as you say. The danger lies not in crude mobs storming the walls but in the slow domestication of despotism: opponents rebranded as usurpers, culture reduced to spectacle, and truth repossessed as state property. Once hatred is enshrined as policy, pluralism collapses into monopoly, and the republic wakes to discover that its liberties were not stolen overnight but pawned, piece by piece, in broad daylight.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Based on social media comments (mainly American), the bulk of commentators see the problem as a political Republican v Democrat issue, it’s not.
This is a social issue and is spreading world wide, authoritarianism and the financial divide is on the increase Trump has only made it front and center, putting the issue in the world’s spotlight and for that I thank him. Now the people are aware and thinking about it, we (the collective) might, just might be able to stop the rot.
LikeLike